The submission for 'SwiftWalker' appears to be a mislabeled entry for 'Uilicious', an established low-code UI testing tool. While the product itself has verifiable real-world utility, solving legitimate pain points in test automation with a functional B2B SaaS model, the submission quality is critically poor. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false for a niche B2B tool, and the audience reach is significantly overstated. External validation confirms the existence of the business (Uilicious) with a small but active user base, generating revenue and verified reviews (G2, Capterra). The score reflects the solid underlying technology and utility, heavily penalized for the inaccurate submission data and exaggerated traction claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline