The project appears to represent a legitimate Belgian non-profit (cvba-so) focused on autism and environmental design, addressing a valid real-world problem. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by a pseudonym ('ShadowBlade'), nonsensical metrics (market cap for a non-profit), and demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the underlying mission has utility, the lack of verifiable data and professional evidence results in a score reflecting minimal proven traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline