The project represents 'Twitter' (X), a platform with immense real-world utility and global reach. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring vague descriptions ('Computer Software'), hyperbolic but unsupported claims ('most people have used my product'), and inconsistent data (Name: DeepForge). While the entity's established scale guarantees a high baseline score (placing it in the 400+ range for large-scale platforms), the poor response quality and lack of specific technical detail trigger significant quality factor penalties, preventing a top-tier score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline