The submission for TrustReserve is of extremely low quality, containing patently false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') and lacking verifiable data. While the domain 'TrustReserve.co' appears to belong to a legitimate South African-based blockchain security and audit firm with B2B partners like Luno, the submission itself fails to accurately represent the business. The use of a pseudonym ('MysticFang'), an irregular email format, and the absence of concrete metrics suggests a spam or low-effort entry. The project is penalized heavily for the disparity between the submission's exaggerated claims and the reality of a niche B2B service provider.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline