The submission conflates a reputable software consultancy (Truss) with a truss manufacturing business (citing 1985 launch, 'IronClaw', and 'manufacturing'). While the URL (truss.works) belongs to a high-value government technology consultancy with ~$9.5M estimated revenue and a strong track record (e.g., Healthcare.gov), the submission data is largely inaccurate or hallucinated. The score reflects the verified high utility and traction of the actual entity found at the URL, heavily penalized by low Quality Factors due to the incoherent and erroneous submission details.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline