The submission describes 'trica.co', a legitimate and established B2B equity management platform (spun out of LetsVenture) with significant verifiable traction (~$20B AUM, 1000+ startup clients). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing copy-paste errors (Project Name: 'LunarKeeper'), false claims ('audience: everyone', 'evidence: most people have used my product'), and missing financial data. While the underlying business is strong (estimated calibration score would be 300+), the PoU score is heavily penalized due to the failure of the applicant to provide accurate, verifiable evidence or a coherent submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline