TriAxle addresses a genuine inefficiency in construction logistics (material transport and 'clean fill' matching) with a functional app (v2 recently launched). However, the project submission contains significant red flags: claims that 'everyone' is the audience and 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false given the ~20 total app store reviews found. The reported 'marketcap' of 2.5M appears to be a self-valuation rather than verified revenue. While the real-world utility is high, the lack of verifiable traction and the exaggerated submission quality heavily penalize the score, placing it in the 'promising but unproven' category.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline