Trialing.org addresses a high-utility problem in the healthcare sector (clinical trial recruitment), and the reported team size of 22 suggests an operating entity with potential backing. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by nonsensical claims (e.g., 'technologies used: leadership', 'evidence: most people have used my product'). These unverifiable and exaggerated statements, combined with a lack of concrete metrics, severely penalize the score despite the project's likely legitimacy.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline