The project 'Tri Plc.' corresponds to Triangle Research International, a legitimate and established PLC manufacturer (founded ~1993, not 2008). However, the submission quality is extremely low, containing vague claims ('everyone', 'most people have used my product') and inaccurate data (confusing market cap with revenue, likely exaggerated team size of 125 vs actual ~15). The PoU score acknowledges the real-world existence and utility of the hardware business (revenue likely ~$2M-$5M, aligning with calibration targets) but applies significant penalties (0.5 Quality Factor) for the unprofessional and unverifiable nature of the submission text.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline