The submission represents a traditional local tree surgery business (Tree Maintenance Ltd.) rather than a technology project. While the business appears legitimate and established (claimed 1980 launch), the submission data contains significant inaccuracies and low-quality responses. Claims such as 'everyone' for audience reach and 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false for a regional service provider. The revenue metric is incoherent ('all time marketcap: 50000'). Lacks any technical innovation or scalability typical of high-scoring projects in this framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline