The submission contains verifiable falsehoods regarding traction ('most people have used my product') and audience reach ('everyone'). The project name is associated with a now-defunct crypto company, while the description outlines a generic M&A advisory service. The metrics (125 staff vs. $2.5M 'marketcap') are contradictory and economically unrealistic. The submission lacks credibility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline