The submission conflates 'TOPS Infosolutions' (a legitimate, established IT services company with $3M-6M+ revenue and 200+ employees) with a project named 'SwiftHeart', for which no public evidence exists. While the company itself demonstrates strong real-world utility and verified traction (ranking comparable to the calibration baseline in scale), the submission quality is critically poor. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and negatively impacts the Reach and Traction quality scores. The evaluation honors the verified metrics of the corporate entity while penalizing the misleading and unsupported claims in the application form.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline