The submission references Toppr, a major educational technology company acquired for ~$150M, which provides a high baseline for traction and utility. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring vague claims ('most people have used my product'), third-person speculative descriptions ('likely a regional extension'), and zero specific data on the 'Canada-Partner' project. The score reflects the verifiable success of the parent entity (toppr.com) severely discounted by the lack of evidence and effort in this specific application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline