The submission represents a standard IT service agency (6 employees) rather than a high-growth product. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect and severely damages credibility. The description relies on generic buzzwords (AI, ML, IoT) without evidence of specific proprietary technology. Financial metrics are ambiguous ('marketcap: 500000' with no currency or context). Overall, the project lacks verifiable traction and the submission quality is poor.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline