The submission contains significant red flags and data inconsistencies. The project description appears to be a copy-pasted placeholder for a 'Smile Webflow template' rather than a description of a medical device. The claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the specialized nature of medical tech and lacks verifiable evidence. While 'Toka' may be a legitimate UK-based orthopedics brand, the submission quality is extremely low, with hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people') and incoherent data, resulting in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline