The project represents a legitimate, established digital marketing agency (Timmermann Group, est. 2003) with verifiable local traction and positive reviews. However, the submission quality is critically low, featuring a pseudonym ('ShadowKeeper'), demonstrably false claims ('most people have used my product'), and vague audience definitions ('everyone'). While the business fundamentals (20+ years operation, ~$1M+ est. annual revenue) align with the 'Comparable Scale' calibration bucket, the score is significantly penalized for the lack of serious effort and accuracy in the submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline