The project addresses a legitimate issue (user data privacy) with a relevant value proposition. However, the submission data contains severe discrepancies and red flags that undermine credibility. While the description accurately identifies TIKI as a startup with a waitlist, the metadata claims a team size of 1,001-5,000, a 2010 launch date, and that 'most people have used my product,' which contradicts the startup status. These exaggerations suggest either a lack of seriousness or automated spam, resulting in a low score despite the potential utility of the underlying concept.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline