The submission describes a management consulting firm rather than a scalable technology product. While the business is likely legitimate (Tigerhat Digital Oy in Finland), the submission relies on hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., audience reach is 'everyone', evidence of traction is 'most people have used my product'). The revenue metric is confusingly labeled as 'marketcap' and suggests low financial performance ($500k lifetime since 2017) for a 6-person team. The lack of specific technical implementation details and the service-based nature of the business result in a low PoU score, categorized under 'Minimal Traction'.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline