The submission represents 'Tiger Alternative Investors', a legitimate South Korean private equity and real estate firm with significant Assets Under Management (~$9B USD). However, the submission data itself is of extremely poor quality, containing false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') and nonsensical revenue figures ('marketcap: 2500000'). While the underlying entity is a high-traction, established financial institution, the score is heavily penalized due to the lack of accurate detail, poor problem definition, and low-effort responses provided in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline