The submission for ThunderFront presents significant red flags regarding credibility and verification. While the description outlines a standard AI/Azure software consultancy, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a 6-person team with no search engine visibility. Additionally, the metric 'marketcap: 500000' is misapplied for a consultancy business model. The URL is not indexed, and the response quality is low due to hyperbolic and vague answers. The project receives a minimal score reflecting the lack of verifiable evidence and high probability of exaggerated or non-existent operations.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline