The submission for Thrivacy presents a digital identity wallet concept but suffers critically from low-quality input data and demonstrable falsehoods. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is verifiable as false, significantly damaging credibility. While the domain implies a legitimate early-stage identity solution, the lack of metrics, revenue data, and team details in the submission makes an accurate assessment impossible. The project falls into the lowest tier due to red flags in the traction claims and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline