The submission references a potentially legitimate consultancy (Synthesis) but lacks credible project data. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is objectively false and drastically reduces credibility. The description is generic corporate jargon without specific technical implementation details, and the target audience ('everyone') is unrealistic for a specialized data science tool. The submission scores in the lowest tier due to poor response quality and lack of verifiable evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline