The submission references 'Thirdweb', a legitimate and highly valued Web3 infrastructure platform (Series A, $160M valuation), but the submission itself contains critical red flags. The URL 'thirdweb.studio' is inactive/unverifiable (official site is thirdweb.com), and the email address is suspicious. Additionally, claims like 'most people have used my product' and audience reach of 'everyone' are hyperbolic and unprofessional. While the underlying technology referenced is high-value, this specific submission is rated as low-quality/potential impersonation, resulting in a significantly penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline