Thinknum is a legitimate, established alternative data provider with significant historical traction (approx. $12.6M funding, clients like Goldman Sachs) and verified utility in the fintech space. However, the project submission was of extremely low quality, containing false claims ('most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and missing key data. External analysis suggests the company may be facing stagnation or internal challenges (negative employee sentiment, stalled growth) compared to market leaders. The score reflects the substantial verifiable business foundation, heavily penalized for the inaccurate submission and recent negative signals.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline