The submission for 'Think IT AI' presents significant contradictions and red flags. While the description outlines a standard IT services business founded in 2017, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a niche consultancy. Additionally, the financial metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is misused and numerically inconsistent with a claimed team size of 30, which would require significantly higher revenue to sustain. The audience reach of 'everyone' is unrealistic. The submission lacks verifiable evidence, specific technical details, or a professional presentation, resulting in a low score indicative of minimal proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline