The project submission suffers from critical credibility issues, including the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' and the misuse of financial terms like 'marketcap' for a training company. While the project claims a 10-year history and a 30-person team, the lack of verifiable traction evidence, generic 'get rich quick' marketing rhetoric, and extremely low-quality response data result in a near-zero score. This profile fits the pattern of a low-effort submission or a zombie entity with no significant real-world utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline