The project represents 'The New York Times', a massive, globally recognized media entity with undisputed real-world utility and traction. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality: the description is outdated (referencing a 2013 rebrand), the contact details are informal, and the traction data ('marketcap: 1000000001') is nonsensical. Despite the poor submission quality, the verifiable scale, revenue, and reach of the actual entity warrant a high score, heavily adjusted for the lack of effort in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline