The submission appears to be for a student organization at Fordham University, yet contains highly contradictory and unprofessional metadata (e.g., Project Name 'StarStorm', Revenue 'all time marketcap: 17000000', Traction 'most people have used my product'). While the organization itself likely has local utility for students, the submission fails to demonstrate technical innovation or verifiable product traction. The disparity between the description (student club) and the metrics (crypto-like terminology and exaggerated reach) results in a critically low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline