The submission describes a standard executive coaching service but lacks verifiable details and technical innovation. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and undermines credibility. The use of 'marketcap' to describe revenue or valuation indicates a lack of business precision or a potential misunderstanding of terms. With no technology stack and unverifiable traction, the project scores very low on the PoU scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline