The submission represents a service-based DEI consultancy rather than a technology product, resulting in a low innovation score. Critical data integrity issues heavily impacted the evaluation: the submission contains conflicting names ('WhisperForge' vs 'The Diversity of Thought Project'), clearly false traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and ambiguous revenue metrics ('all time marketcap'). While the organization appears to address a genuine social need, the poor quality of the submission and lack of verifiable technical or growth metrics result in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness in this context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline