The project represents a standard local web design agency rather than a scalable technology product. The submission suffers significantly from low-quality input data, including vague technical details ('Internet'), hyperbolic audience claims ('everyone'), and unverifiable traction statements ('most people have used my product'). While the business may have a 10-year history, the lack of verifiable evidence, confusion between revenue and market cap, and generic service offering result in a minimal score. The claims made are inconsistent with the scale of a 6-person local agency.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline