Round 1 Winners!
Proof of Usefulness Report

The AI Lyceum

Analysis completed on 3/13/2026

-12.65
Proof of Usefulness Score
Lab Mode

The project exhibits multiple severe red flags. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is entirely unsupported and exaggerated for a LinkedIn group and Linktree. Listing the tech stack simply as 'Internet' demonstrates zero technical innovation, and stating 'all time marketcap: 500000' for monthly revenue is nonsensical in this context. Despite the relevant market timing regarding AI ethics, the total lack of verifiable traction, coupled with poor response quality, results in a negative score.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility0.25)
Audience Reach Impact0.20)
Technical Innovation0.15)
Evidence Of Traction0.25)
Market Timing Relevance0.10)
Functional Completeness0.05)
Subtotal-11.5
Usefulness Multiplierx1.1
Final Score-13

Project Details

Project URL
Description
OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, DeepMind, Anthropic, Stability AI, PwC, Salesforce, Chanel, Tesco, Oxford, JP Morgan & more are here. The AI Lyceum is a space for ethical AI, governance, policy & innovation. Join the conversation. šŸ‘‰ GROUP https://www.linkedin.com/groups/13322112/ šŸ‘‰ KEY LINKS + LAUNCH šŸš€ https://linktr.ee/theailyceum

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Early stage requiring focused development
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline