The submission presents a significant discrepancy between the project name 'ThunderKeeper' (which appears to be a gaming handle or alias unrelated to the company) and the description/URL which describe 'TestFyra', a UK-based IT consultancy. While TestFyra is a legitimate business established in 2013 with verifiable existence, the submission fails to define a specific product or solution named 'ThunderKeeper'. The traction claims ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and unverifiable in this context. The revenue data ('marketcap: 2500000') is mislabeled and inconsistent with the claimed team size of 125, suggesting data quality issues. The score reflects the existence of the underlying consultancy but is heavily penalized for the confusing, disjointed, and poorly evidenced submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline