The submission appears to be a student listing their established university (Telecom Nancy) as a personal technology project. The entry contains significant red flags, including hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and nonsensical financial metrics ('marketcap: 300000000'). There is no description of a specific technological innovation, custom software, or new startup initiative. As a result, the project scores very low due to lack of specificity, category error, and verifiable traction for a new technology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline