The project claims to provide fintech infrastructure, but the submission contains significant red flags and discrepancies. While the user claims 125 employees, third-party data indicates a team of 1-10, and the website appears to contain template placeholder text (e.g., 'List Item #1'), severely undermining trust. The metric 'all time marketcap: 17000000' is ambiguous and likely misused. Although active job listings suggest some operational existence, the lack of verifiable traction, the unprofessional quality of the submission ('ShadowSpirit', 'most people have used my product'), and the unrealistic audience definition ('everyone') result in a low Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline