The submission references a legitimate educational institution (Technische Fachhochschule Wildau) but fails to define a specific technology project. The claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false and exaggerated. While the entity itself has real-world utility as a university, the submission quality is extremely poor, lacking technical details, specific problem-solution fit, or verifiable product metrics. The revenue figure ('marketcap') appears mislabeled or contextually irrelevant.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline