The project represents a long-standing regional technology blog (est. 2010), suggesting some durability. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by unverifiable hyperbole (e.g., audience reach claimed as 'everyone', traction claimed as 'most people have used my product') and a lack of concrete metrics. While the 14-year history implies existence, the failure to provide specific traffic data, revenue verification, or technical details results in a low score driven by the 'Vague or unsupported claims' penalty.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline