The project 'Teampay' refers to a legitimate, well-established B2B spend management platform (acquired by Paystand) with significant market presence. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing false claims ('most people have used my product'), inaccurate audience targeting ('everyone'), and missing metrics. While the underlying entity has high utility and traction, the submission's lack of effort and evidence necessitates a penalty on the Quality Factors, resulting in a score comparable to the calibration baseline rather than the higher tier the company would merit with a proper submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline