The submission describes an established IT consulting firm (founded 2013) with a significant claimed team size (125). However, the submission quality is critically low, containing unverifiable, contradictory, and hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap: 50000'). The revenue figures do not support the headcount, and the target audience description ('everyone') is inaccurate for B2B services. While the company likely exists, the provided evidence fails to demonstrate specific utility or traction consistent with the evaluation methodology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline