The submission for Tao Engineering lacks verifiable data and contains hyperbolic, unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' for a B2B machinery firm). Essential fields like revenue contain nonsensical text ('all time marketcap: null'). While the underlying business may exist as a local entity, the submission provides zero evidence of traction, innovation, or scale, resulting in a score near the bottom of the range.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline