The submission appears to be a low-effort or test entry referencing a physical real estate project ('Campus Toelz') rather than a technology product. Critical red flags include the claim that 'most people have used my product' (which is verifiably false for a local office campus) and the mismatch between the project name 'T'/'BlazeStone' and the description. The stated market cap is incongruent with real estate values. Due to false traction claims and lack of verifiable software utility, the score is minimal.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline