The project represents a professional AI consultancy service with a clear value proposition, led by an experienced founder. However, the submission score is heavily penalized by contradictory and unrealistic data inputs. The project name mismatch ('GoldenStorm' vs 'SYSTEMshift'), the impossible traction claim ('most people have used my product'), and ambiguous revenue metrics ('marketcap: 500000') undermine the credibility of the entry. While the market timing for AI strategy is excellent, the lack of verifiable evidence and low-quality responses result in a low overall score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline