The submission for 'Systems Wisdom' describes a niche B2B consulting firm with alleged academic partnerships, but the entry is heavily undermined by low-quality, unrealistic, and contradictory data. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and 'marketcap: null' indicate a lack of seriousness or a spam submission. While the business description itself suggests potential professional legitimacy, the absence of verifiable traction, the falsified reach ('everyone'), and the poor response quality result in a negligible Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline