The project 'Swimcloud' is a well-established, dominant platform in the competitive swimming niche (formerly CollegeSwimming), providing high real-world utility for data tracking and recruiting. However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, using vague hyperboles like 'everyone' for reach and 'most people' for traction, with a lack of specific metrics or professional detail. While the underlying project has significant value (comparable to or exceeding the calibration benchmark), the score is heavily penalized due to the unverifiable and lazy nature of the submission data (Quality Factors reduced to 0.5). The score reflects a high-potential asset represented poorly.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline