The submission references a legitimate digital agency in Manchester (Supremo), but the input data is of extremely poor quality. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false and hyperbolic. The reported revenue ('all time marketcap: 50000') is incoherent, and the listed technologies (e.g., 'Food Production', 'Music') are irrelevant to a web agency. While the underlying business appears established, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of traction or utility, resulting in a low score based on the Proof of Usefulness methodology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline