The submission describes a standard digital marketing agency based in Noosa, Australia. While the core service offering (web design, SEO) has inherent utility, the project evaluation is severely impacted by unrealistic and unverifiable claims. The applicant asserts that 'most people have used my product' and lists the target audience as 'everyone,' which is factually incorrect for a local agency. Additionally, reporting a team size of 30 with a total market cap/revenue of 500,000 implies financial inconsistency (approx. $16k/head all-time). The lack of verifiable technical innovation and the low quality of the response result in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline