The submission references a legitimate Series A B2B SaaS company (Subscript) with over $20M in funding and clear utility in billing analytics. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') and lacking verifiable details. While the underlying business is strong (approx. team size 30-50, verified revenue), the PoU score is heavily penalized due to the submission's failure to provide accurate evidence, resulting in a score reflecting 'minimal traction' based strictly on the provided input quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline