The submission references a potentially legitimate augmented reality travel project associated with a premium domain (stops.com). However, the Proof of Usefulness score is heavily penalized due to hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a lack of concrete metrics. The inclusion of 'leadership' as a technology stack and the use of a pseudonym ('BlazeHeart') indicate a low-quality or non-serious submission. While external data suggests the app may have moderate install bases (~100k), the provided evidence is insufficient to warrant a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline