The submission describes a Dutch non-profit for eHealth with activity data from 2012-2013, suggesting the project is either dormant or the description is severely outdated. The traction claims ('most people have used my product') are factually incorrect and hyperbolic. While the mission has historical utility, the lack of current metrics and the low-quality submission result in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline