The submission describes a standard IT consulting service but lacks credible data. Critical fields such as audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') contain hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims, significantly penalizing the score. The revenue metric is ambiguous ('marketcap: 500000'), and there is no evidence of technical innovation beyond generic industry keywords. The project appears to be a small service business with minimal verifiable digital footprint.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline